Product Details
- Color: Black
- Brand: OCZ
- Model: OCZSSD3-2VTX240G
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 1.00" h x
4.00" w x
5.80" l,
.50 pounds
- Hard Disk: 240GB
Features
- NAND Flash Components: Multi-Level Cell (SLC) NAND Flash Memory, Interface: SATA II 3.0Gbp/s, Form Factor: 3.5" form factor
- Life Expectancy: 2 million hours Mean Time Before Failure (MTBF), Reliability: ECC: 27 bytes of redundancy per 512 bytes data
- Operating Temperature: 0C - 70C, Storage Temperature: -45C - 85C, Shock Resistance: 1500G, Certifications: RoHS, CE, FCC
- Max Read: up to 285 MB/s, Max Write: up to 275 MB/s, Sustained Write: up to 250 MB/s, 4k Random Write
- Power Consumption: Active 2Watts Idle:0.5Watts, Performance Optimization: TRIM (requires OS support)
Product Description
OCZ Vertex 2 SATA II 3.5 inch Solid State Drives deliver the same industry-leading performance as the 2.5 inch edition in a larger, lower cost per gigabyte form factor to easily integrate into desktop applications without the need to install additional hardware. Designed to excel in both sequential and random read/write speeds up to 50,000 4KB random write IOPS, the 3.5 inch Vertex 2 maximizes productivity when using as a primary storage or boot drive, minimizing program load times and completing tasks with blazing speed. Using the latest controller technology, the 3.5 inch Vertex 2 provides a faster, more responsive PC experience complete with TRIM support to keep your drive operating at peak performance in Windows 7 systems. Built with SATA 3Gb/s, Vertex 2 3.5 inch drives easily integrate into today’s desktop platforms as the ultimate storage upgrade.
Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful.
By Joel Dazo
Review from someone who actually bought and used this product.I installed the 240 GB Vertex 2 Series SATA II 3.5 SSD on my computer and it worked fine the first 30 days. After that, a system power up suddenly had my BIOS complaining that it did not detect the SSD. So, I ended up not being able to use the computer at all since it was the primary disk.To troubleshoot, I put my old hard drive in (the one I replaced the SSD with) and the computer found it right away after a reboot. This shows that the problem was the SSD and not not my motherboard or cable.I contacted the company and their solution was for me to spend more money into sending it back to them so they can replace it. This is so unacceptable since the SSD is not cheap (more than $300) and now they have to milk me more for a defective product?!I received an RMA from OCZ Technology and I had to ship the product costing me around $11.00They sent me back a new one and I installed it right away. It's been working but then just today, April 22, 2012, I experienced the same problem.The BIOS startup says: Drive 0 not found. Error: No such partition.I put in my trusty old HDD on the same SATA port and it went along just fine. To troubleshoot and eliminate that it's just my motherboard.So, it's really the SSD that went bad. Again.I won't recommend this product nor the company itself. I believe that the consumer doesn't need to pay shipping when sending back a defective product.
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
By Mike Hough
OK, it's not the biggest drive on the planet, but it beats out everything else on speed. It's my #1 drive in a Mac Pro tower with all 3 other bays being 3 TB drives. (video editing and enormous numbers of still shots edited daily) but the SSD only has the OS and the Applications folder on it, all other files are in the users folder which has been relocated onto a 3TB drive.That way I have the best of both world, super fast speed but not over filling the SSD with unnecessary files which are really better just on storage drives. Have not had any problems with the known problem of "Background Garbage collection," read more here:[...]As soon as I installed it I noticed the difference and the only drawback is the cost per GB so far.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
By fred
Great SSD for the price. Not the latest version but the performance is enough and as advertised.It does provide enough room for the OS and large applications.Tested on Win 7 64 bits
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar